Search found 15 matches
- Wed Jun 11, 2008 8:43 pm
- Forum: ZoneMinder Previous Versions
- Topic: Better motion detection?
- Replies: 99
- Views: 150362
I've now tried the latest patch this evening but are getting some strange results when looking at the delta image. The images looks like this: http://i288.photobucket.com/albums/ll176/ubermood/Delta3.jpg It seems that the resolution is wrong, or something? :roll: I will try some more testing later ...
- Wed Jun 11, 2008 6:02 pm
- Forum: ZoneMinder Previous Versions
- Topic: Better motion detection?
- Replies: 99
- Views: 150362
- Mon May 26, 2008 11:28 am
- Forum: ZoneMinder Previous Versions
- Topic: Better motion detection?
- Replies: 99
- Views: 150362
- Sat May 24, 2008 10:39 pm
- Forum: ZoneMinder Previous Versions
- Topic: Better motion detection?
- Replies: 99
- Views: 150362
The light changed should be compensated. Could you post some of the log lines around when the lighting changes? (You should see "(-8, -8, -8)" or similar values gradually decaying to zero. This is essentially the offset in the lighting values. Yes, I can see those values directly after a lightning ...
- Fri May 23, 2008 4:07 pm
- Forum: ZoneMinder Previous Versions
- Topic: Better motion detection?
- Replies: 99
- Views: 150362
- Fri May 23, 2008 11:57 am
- Forum: ZoneMinder Previous Versions
- Topic: Better motion detection?
- Replies: 99
- Views: 150362
I've also discovered that average pixel and blobs are ignored, even after applying the latest patch by mor released on this forum. My settings are working pretty well now. The only thing I'm getting false triggers from is all sudden changes my camera does to compensate lightning. Pretty annoying ...
- Mon May 19, 2008 8:00 am
- Forum: ZoneMinder Previous Versions
- Topic: Better motion detection?
- Replies: 99
- Views: 150362
As I understand it, it learns to ignore areas that are constantly appearing in the image and filter out that "noise". What happens if I temporarily put a chair or any other object in front of the camera, for say.. 5 minutes and then remove it. Will that area still be ignored until I restart ZM, or ...
- Sat May 17, 2008 11:17 am
- Forum: ZoneMinder Previous Versions
- Topic: Better motion detection?
- Replies: 99
- Views: 150362
I've been testing various settings of image blend now. My monitor is currently updating around 1.5-2fps. 1% was way too slow in compensating lightning changes. 10% was pretty OK, but I was still receiving a bunch of false alerts when my cameras built-in light compensator was working. Now I't running ...
- Sat May 17, 2008 1:06 am
- Forum: ZoneMinder Previous Versions
- Topic: Better motion detection?
- Replies: 99
- Views: 150362
Now it seems to work correctly! I took a look at zm_image.cpp and found this: if ( config.fast_image_blends ) . . } else { . . ..and realized that "ZM_FAST_IMAGE_BLENDS" needs to be turned off. I turned it off and the Average counter started ticking down and an image was also created in /tmp. It's ...
- Fri May 16, 2008 4:56 am
- Forum: ZoneMinder Previous Versions
- Topic: Better motion detection?
- Replies: 99
- Views: 150362
- Thu May 15, 2008 12:52 pm
- Forum: ZoneMinder Previous Versions
- Topic: Better motion detection?
- Replies: 99
- Views: 150362
- Wed May 14, 2008 7:53 pm
- Forum: ZoneMinder Previous Versions
- Topic: Better motion detection?
- Replies: 99
- Views: 150362
- Wed May 14, 2008 7:12 am
- Forum: ZoneMinder Previous Versions
- Topic: Better motion detection?
- Replies: 99
- Views: 150362
- Wed May 14, 2008 5:13 am
- Forum: ZoneMinder Previous Versions
- Topic: Better motion detection?
- Replies: 99
- Views: 150362
ZM worked fine with no errors before patching. I changed all "/* double pts = */" entries in your diff to "double pts =" instead, then I also removed "static struct timezone..." from zm_monitor.h and leaved the "extern struct timezone" line there instead. Did I something wrong? All the "/* double ...
- Tue May 13, 2008 10:12 pm
- Forum: ZoneMinder Previous Versions
- Topic: Better motion detection?
- Replies: 99
- Views: 150362
Hi there! This is really interesting stuff! I tried your patch on version 1.23.2, with some slight modifications on your diff-file (some entries seemed to be incorrect).. but I am expericing problems with the "zma". Here is what my /var/log/messages says: May 13 23:48:43 yin zma_m1[7058]: ERR [Got ...