some similarity... maybe they are using zm?

sugacapra · Post by **sugacapra** » Tue Jan 24, 2006 9:14 pm

reading this one, seem they have developed some zm brother?
http://www.tectonic.co.za/viewr.php?id=825

Post by **zoneminder** » Tue Jan 24, 2006 10:18 pm

Maybe, but I think it's a 'little' brother if anything

[/quote]

SyRenity · Post by **SyRenity** » Wed Jan 25, 2006 9:25 am

Hi.

"Up to 200 cameras"? Wonder what kind of beast they should build, in order to support this.

ZM theoretically can support this number, correct? Probably via multiple ZM boxes deployed, and perhaps one master ZM box. Any thoughts of a possible configuration?

jameswilson · Post by **jameswilson** » Wed Jan 25, 2006 10:51 am

I had thought the easist way was to use multiple zm boxes then use a 'monster' zm4ms to link them all together. There is work going on to split out the anaylising and detection to slave boxes and store everything on a single central box. I personally think (with my limited knowledge) that this would be a big to look after long term. I have thought about clustering but again i donbt know enough. Specs like that are usually headline and 'possible' but never used, and if you did need it there would be enough money available to find out how...lol

James