DCS-900 rev B
DCS-900 rev B
Hey all!
Just wanted to put a notice out there that D-Link has changed their DCS-900 product to a Revision B. In short...it is not that great. In the past I have used the Revision A DCS-900 and got a solid 10FPS using the path of /video.cgi. Well, the path of video.cgi on the Rev B camera will get you no where so you resort to /image.jpg which will only produce 3FPS no matter what settings you throw at either zoneminder or the camera itself.
Personally, I am really getting sick of Dlink and I am about to convert to recommending only Axis from now on.
I am going to miss my little Rev A DCS-900 cams...they were an inexpensive solution for some of the non-profits that I deal with.
Later,
Mike
Just wanted to put a notice out there that D-Link has changed their DCS-900 product to a Revision B. In short...it is not that great. In the past I have used the Revision A DCS-900 and got a solid 10FPS using the path of /video.cgi. Well, the path of video.cgi on the Rev B camera will get you no where so you resort to /image.jpg which will only produce 3FPS no matter what settings you throw at either zoneminder or the camera itself.
Personally, I am really getting sick of Dlink and I am about to convert to recommending only Axis from now on.
I am going to miss my little Rev A DCS-900 cams...they were an inexpensive solution for some of the non-profits that I deal with.
Later,
Mike
- zoneminder
- Site Admin
- Posts: 5215
- Joined: Wed Jul 09, 2003 2:07 pm
- Location: Bristol, UK
- Contact:
Might not just be the firmware - I know Linksys sometimes change everything between versions on some of their products, including processor, embedded OS etc.
My guess is that they've found a cheaper way of producing the product using cheaper or fewer components and either the initial firmware is full of bugs, or they've cynically accepted that the revised hardware is "Good enough for some".
The lower cost IP cams I've tried (except gadspot) seem to be marketted as "remote low-res webcams" instead of what we here expect, something capable of capturing a moving image and being able to make out a face. I suspect the manufacturers are relying heavily on the novelty value to a market that doesn't really need them or who don't know better - Geeky Gizmos.
My guess is that they've found a cheaper way of producing the product using cheaper or fewer components and either the initial firmware is full of bugs, or they've cynically accepted that the revised hardware is "Good enough for some".
The lower cost IP cams I've tried (except gadspot) seem to be marketted as "remote low-res webcams" instead of what we here expect, something capable of capturing a moving image and being able to make out a face. I suspect the manufacturers are relying heavily on the novelty value to a market that doesn't really need them or who don't know better - Geeky Gizmos.
30 fps with DCS-900 A or B?
Yesterday, I installed D-Link DCS-900 rev B2, but I'm getting 5fps at average. Load of the system is about 2.
Have you got some suggestions, how to improve these bad results?
(it's running on P166, 64MB RAM, debian linux)
edit:
Yesterday, I installed D-Link DCS-900 rev B2, but I'm getting 5fps at average. Load of the system is about 2.
Code: Select all
11:28:00 up 1:52, 2 users, load average: 2.09, 2.40, 1.79
(it's running on P166, 64MB RAM, debian linux)
edit:
Code: Select all
Apr 6 11:24:37 router-ddm zmc_m1[2525]: INF [Kamera1: 1000 - Capturing at 2.15 fps]
Apr 6 11:28:16 router-ddm zmc_m1[2525]: INF [Kamera1: 2000 - Capturing at 4.57 fps]
Apr 6 11:30:43 router-ddm zmc_m1[2525]: INF [Kamera1: 3000 - Capturing at 6.80 fps]
Apr 6 11:33:10 router-ddm zmc_m1[2525]: INF [Kamera1: 4000 - Capturing at 6.80 fps]
Ok. So I went and bought a D-Link DCS-900 Rev B2.
The camera is working fine through web and java.
I have configured the camera in Zone minder like this:
Source Type: Remote
Function: Monitor
Enable: mark
Remote host name: user:password@192.168.1.xxx
Remote host port: 80 (the wiki sais its the default port and I havent change it).
Remote Host path: I have tried everyting: -still.jpg
-/still.jpg
-/mjpeg.cgi
-mjpeg.cgi
-video.cgi
-/video.cgi
-/image.jpg
-image.jpg
And nothing works. I have tried as well with regex matching off and on. Nothing
What am I doing wrong?. I can use the camera through its web interface but I cant get it working with zone minder.
Thanks
Hugo
PD: Also I get a 1 or 2 seconds lag when I see the image no matter how much compresion I use. Guess thats normal for that cam. Its not problem of the lan cause I have connected the camera to a Gig swight and from there to the computer through a Gig ethernet card. Can someon confirm that the 1 or 2 second la is normal?
The camera is working fine through web and java.
I have configured the camera in Zone minder like this:
Source Type: Remote
Function: Monitor
Enable: mark
Remote host name: user:password@192.168.1.xxx
Remote host port: 80 (the wiki sais its the default port and I havent change it).
Remote Host path: I have tried everyting: -still.jpg
-/still.jpg
-/mjpeg.cgi
-mjpeg.cgi
-video.cgi
-/video.cgi
-/image.jpg
-image.jpg
And nothing works. I have tried as well with regex matching off and on. Nothing
What am I doing wrong?. I can use the camera through its web interface but I cant get it working with zone minder.
Thanks
Hugo
PD: Also I get a 1 or 2 seconds lag when I see the image no matter how much compresion I use. Guess thats normal for that cam. Its not problem of the lan cause I have connected the camera to a Gig swight and from there to the computer through a Gig ethernet card. Can someon confirm that the 1 or 2 second la is normal?
-
- Posts: 5111
- Joined: Wed Jun 08, 2005 8:07 pm
- Location: Midlands UK
i think i rember dlinks being poorly supported on linux. But have you checked you matched your monitor settings to the cam image, and what is in your logs
James Wilson
Disclaimer: The above is pure theory and may work on a good day with the wind behind it. etc etc.
http://www.securitywarehouse.co.uk
Disclaimer: The above is pure theory and may work on a good day with the wind behind it. etc etc.
http://www.securitywarehouse.co.uk
Thanks for the reply I have been three days trying to get the camera working and looking over the internet but I just can get my mind on what it is.
The camera works fine if I acces direcly through firefox so I guess its no a linux problem.
The log I get in zmwatch.log is this:
04/12/07 19:49:20.799929 zmwatch[5135].ERR [Can't get shared memory id '7a6d2001', 1: No such file or directory]
04/12/07 19:49:20.800145 zmwatch[5135].INF [Restarting capture daemon for Cam1, shared memory not valid]
04/12/07 19:49:20.927068 zmwatch[5135].INF ['zmc -m 1' starting at 07/04/12 19:49:20, pid = 26280]
zmaudit.log:
04/12/07 19:40:44.594279 zmaudit[5133].DBG [Found database monitor '1']
04/12/07 19:40:44.594701 zmaudit[5133].DBG [Got 0 events]
04/12/07 19:40:44.594829 zmaudit[5133].DBG [Found filesystem monitor '1']
04/12/07 19:40:44.609522 zmaudit[5133].DBG [Got 0 events]
Its just keeps on repeating that again and again. I am guessing is something to do with linux users rights, but I just dont know what to do.
Any help?
Thanks
Hugo
The camera works fine if I acces direcly through firefox so I guess its no a linux problem.
The log I get in zmwatch.log is this:
04/12/07 19:49:20.799929 zmwatch[5135].ERR [Can't get shared memory id '7a6d2001', 1: No such file or directory]
04/12/07 19:49:20.800145 zmwatch[5135].INF [Restarting capture daemon for Cam1, shared memory not valid]
04/12/07 19:49:20.927068 zmwatch[5135].INF ['zmc -m 1' starting at 07/04/12 19:49:20, pid = 26280]
zmaudit.log:
04/12/07 19:40:44.594279 zmaudit[5133].DBG [Found database monitor '1']
04/12/07 19:40:44.594701 zmaudit[5133].DBG [Got 0 events]
04/12/07 19:40:44.594829 zmaudit[5133].DBG [Found filesystem monitor '1']
04/12/07 19:40:44.609522 zmaudit[5133].DBG [Got 0 events]
Its just keeps on repeating that again and again. I am guessing is something to do with linux users rights, but I just dont know what to do.
Any help?
Thanks
Hugo
-
- Posts: 5111
- Joined: Wed Jun 08, 2005 8:07 pm
- Location: Midlands UK
i doubt it, can you wget an image from it using the command line?
James Wilson
Disclaimer: The above is pure theory and may work on a good day with the wind behind it. etc etc.
http://www.securitywarehouse.co.uk
Disclaimer: The above is pure theory and may work on a good day with the wind behind it. etc etc.
http://www.securitywarehouse.co.uk
Thanks for the quick reply. If I have tried different combinations for wget:
jo@Aquest:~$ wget http://192.168.1.100:100/still.jpg
--22:17:00-- http://192.168.1.100:100/still.jpg
=> `still.jpg'
S'està connectant a 192.168.1.100:100... conectat.
HTTP: Petició enviada, esperant resposta... 404 File Not Found
22:17:00 ERROR 404 File Not Found.
jo@Aquest:~$ wget http://192.168.1.100/still.jpg
--22:17:06-- http://192.168.1.100/still.jpg
=> `still.jpg'
S'està connectant a 192.168.1.100:80... conectat.
HTTP: Petició enviada, esperant resposta... 404 File Not Found
22:17:06 ERROR 404 File Not Found.
jo@Aquest:~$ wget 192.168.1.100/still.jpg
--22:17:16-- http://192.168.1.100/still.jpg
=> `still.jpg'
S'està connectant a 192.168.1.100:80... conectat.
HTTP: Petició enviada, esperant resposta... 404 File Not Found
22:17:16 ERROR 404 File Not Found.
jo@Aquest:~$ wget user:password@192.168.1.100/still.jpg
--22:17:38-- ftp://user/password@192.168.1.100/still.jpg
=> `still.jpg'
Resolent jo... Fallat: Name or service not known.
jo@Aquest:~$ wget user:password@192.168.1.100:100/still.jpg
--22:17:47-- ftp://user/password@192.168.1.100:100/still.jpg
=> `still.jpg'
Resolent jo... 1.0.0.0
S'està connectant a jo|1.0.0.0|:21...
After this it just gives time out and tries again until I stop it. If I use image.jpg instead of still.jpg it sais: Name or service not known. , whatever way I try to get the image.
So it seems like the camera is not giving the image, the weird thing is that through Firefox I can see the picture and I can use the Java button to see the video as well.
I am using the port 100 for sure because I have forced it now to be that port to see if it was any problem with the port 80 (default), but the results are the same.
Hugo
jo@Aquest:~$ wget http://192.168.1.100:100/still.jpg
--22:17:00-- http://192.168.1.100:100/still.jpg
=> `still.jpg'
S'està connectant a 192.168.1.100:100... conectat.
HTTP: Petició enviada, esperant resposta... 404 File Not Found
22:17:00 ERROR 404 File Not Found.
jo@Aquest:~$ wget http://192.168.1.100/still.jpg
--22:17:06-- http://192.168.1.100/still.jpg
=> `still.jpg'
S'està connectant a 192.168.1.100:80... conectat.
HTTP: Petició enviada, esperant resposta... 404 File Not Found
22:17:06 ERROR 404 File Not Found.
jo@Aquest:~$ wget 192.168.1.100/still.jpg
--22:17:16-- http://192.168.1.100/still.jpg
=> `still.jpg'
S'està connectant a 192.168.1.100:80... conectat.
HTTP: Petició enviada, esperant resposta... 404 File Not Found
22:17:16 ERROR 404 File Not Found.
jo@Aquest:~$ wget user:password@192.168.1.100/still.jpg
--22:17:38-- ftp://user/password@192.168.1.100/still.jpg
=> `still.jpg'
Resolent jo... Fallat: Name or service not known.
jo@Aquest:~$ wget user:password@192.168.1.100:100/still.jpg
--22:17:47-- ftp://user/password@192.168.1.100:100/still.jpg
=> `still.jpg'
Resolent jo... 1.0.0.0
S'està connectant a jo|1.0.0.0|:21...
After this it just gives time out and tries again until I stop it. If I use image.jpg instead of still.jpg it sais: Name or service not known. , whatever way I try to get the image.
So it seems like the camera is not giving the image, the weird thing is that through Firefox I can see the picture and I can use the Java button to see the video as well.
I am using the port 100 for sure because I have forced it now to be that port to see if it was any problem with the port 80 (default), but the results are the same.
Hugo
-
- Posts: 5111
- Joined: Wed Jun 08, 2005 8:07 pm
- Location: Midlands UK
well if wget wont do it zm has no chance
If you want to continue with this cam, then try and get a url that wget can use
Personally id bin anything made by d-link lol
If you want to continue with this cam, then try and get a url that wget can use
Personally id bin anything made by d-link lol
James Wilson
Disclaimer: The above is pure theory and may work on a good day with the wind behind it. etc etc.
http://www.securitywarehouse.co.uk
Disclaimer: The above is pure theory and may work on a good day with the wind behind it. etc etc.
http://www.securitywarehouse.co.uk
Have you tried this path at all?Knobee wrote: To work around, use the URL /mjpeg.cgi and turn OFF regex matching.
I'm seeing up to 30fps using a DCS-900.
The other option is to put the cam in the wild Like W. suggested and someone from the forum can have a go at it.
The big thing is you got to get around the 404 error Which suggests that you are talking to the cam but it is either rejecting the request because your not authorized or the path is not valid.