pico2000 card and size of images????

angelhod · Post by **angelhod** » Sun Sep 28, 2008 3:41 pm

hi i've got card like pico2000
module.conf is set to card 77

i got 3 cameras connected and when all of them got sieze
240x240 everything is fine but when i changed one to 480x320
2 others got f*** up like :

http://www.fotosik.pl/pokaz_obrazek/b7e ... aadd4.html

some plz help me... or it is only the problem of the card and this
card cant do better?[/quote]

TrOjAn · Post by **TrOjAn** » Sun Sep 28, 2008 5:12 pm

If its the single chip card then you will have to keep the sizes UNDER 320 x 240, it just cannot cope with huge sizes for more than one camera.

TrOjAn

angelhod · Post by **angelhod** » Sun Sep 28, 2008 5:45 pm

ehhh

i cant do more then 240x240 .......
damnit i thought that this card is almost the same with Kodicom 4400 except
FPS......................

angelhod · Post by **angelhod** » Sun Sep 28, 2008 5:45 pm

anyway thank You for your reply Tojan

Post by **cordel** » Sun Sep 28, 2008 9:43 pm

On each bt878 device, all of its inputs must match size and palette. It is unable to change on the fly that quickly. bt878 supports up to 640x480 which is interlaced of coarse.

TrOjAn · Post by **TrOjAn** » Sun Sep 28, 2008 11:00 pm

Ahhh now thats interesting... I never thought to do them ALL.. just tried 352 x 288 on all cameras and its working... I am going to try going up again to 384 x 288 and if that works I may try 640 x 480

TrOjAn

angelhod · Post by **angelhod** » Mon Sep 29, 2008 10:51 am

OMFG

Cordel You are the best of the best!!!!!!

now its working fine...

TrOjAn · Post by **TrOjAn** » Mon Sep 29, 2008 10:53 am

Managed to get 384 x 288 but any higher and it loses the picture, broken image in corner.. o well, Im happy with it for now.

TrOjAn

angelhod · Post by **angelhod** » Mon Sep 29, 2008 10:56 am

now got 3 times 640x480

TrOjAn · Post by **TrOjAn** » Mon Sep 29, 2008 11:20 am

angelhod wrote:now got 3 times 640x480

Now dont show off

can you tell me how much memory your pc has installed? I am thinking I may be low on memory.. I use the pico2000 1 chip 4 input pci card and I am unable to get that resolution.

Cheers, TrOjAn

angelhod · Post by **angelhod** » Mon Sep 29, 2008 11:33 am

haha

well first i had pIII 900MHz 256mb ram
and it was warking almost 3 years with kodicom4400 but CPU was almost all the time 80-95% busy...

now after kodicom brok down... i bought that pico2000 or whatever it is...

and changed a computer for these camers.... now it is Athlon XP 1600 or 1700 and only 512mb of ram

and cpu usage is around 62% but now everything goes really smoth with all i do on this machine.... i am planning to add one more camra.....

how much memory u got?

angelhod · Post by **angelhod** » Mon Sep 29, 2008 11:34 am

maybe u got one monitor rotated?

TrOjAn · Post by **TrOjAn** » Mon Sep 29, 2008 12:31 pm

Nope nothing rotated, 764 mb memory on a dedicated ubuntu machine.. running nothing else.

Weird huh? O well.. 384 x 288 aint too bad

TrOjAn

angelhod · Post by **angelhod** » Mon Sep 29, 2008 2:20 pm

sure it is bad....

maybe the u've choosen wrong card type.... my friend had same problem ....

u sure u've set the card to 77?