Constructive criticism
Posted: Wed Mar 11, 2009 11:58 pm
All:
I've been playing with ZM for some time, nearly a year...
Got a PV149 or 150 thingie from BC and a hard wired cam from RS (doesn't matter, it all detects fine, should work)
While I know this is bleeding edged stuff, there is a purpose - security and it needs to work, in a word, critical mass, or folks won't adapt or pay.
I also know, as a sr linux sysadmin, nothing is easy. Most of the leading edge technology is a moving target, ZM is no exception.
The point is simply, ZM is trying to be something for everyone. Considering the obvious limitations of manpower, it' REALLY hard, taking into consideration all the distros. Let the "build from source and here are the dependencies" go (not that there is enough available to comprehend)
I have experienced, first hand, using gentoo, ubuntu, fedora, RHEL the industry is still not ready for prime time in many cases.
What I have learned, is when using the most stable distro, things can go according to (some kind of) plan.
So a little background....
Got etch setup, added a source for ZM in sources.list, installed ZM. A year is like 7 on the internet. Installed ZM v 1.23.X. with relative ease, worked, well, OK.
Time to see if things have improved. Installed Lenny.
The reason?
Debian has proven, time and again, to be a very STABLE distro, unlike ubuntu spinoff of the same - unstable, the issues gentoo has in mgmt, the red-headheaded stepchild RH has divorced - and spun off - Fedora (not to say RH is any kind of distro worth paying for), and yet there are still adjustment in technology that needs to be "massaged" to make life grand. Not for the "average layperson with a spare PC".
And this is sorta the point....
Everyone on the face of this economically depressed world has a leftover, spare pc, that can't run the latest and greatest Microsoft OS and doesn't really care to "shoehorn" it into working cuz it's been a virus magnet that no one can tame, right????
It's all about crime and energy. We want to keep tabs on what's going on. Enter ZM. A pc ready for trash, with a couple hundred dollars and we can feel warm and fuzzy again. Make no mistake, only a few of us are in it for "the thrill of the hunt". The masses just want it to work, at which point, they will pay.
Docs are important. Most don't/can't read (again the masses).
I would pay for a live CD, like Mepis, that is based on a STABLE distro, with a "install me on a HD" button, that just works when it's all said and done. I'm sure many, many would.
Yep, there are lots of variables and it won't work for everyone with a $19 webcam from WalMart, but with some "run of the mill" hardware and $200 or $400 some industry partners working together (like BC and ZM), more folks would jump on-board, write a check for more features.
Just some random thoughts, not meaning to dis on anyone. ZM is a great product, just want to be done in 30 minutes and cover my loved ones, if you know what I mean.
Flame suit on.
I've been playing with ZM for some time, nearly a year...
Got a PV149 or 150 thingie from BC and a hard wired cam from RS (doesn't matter, it all detects fine, should work)
While I know this is bleeding edged stuff, there is a purpose - security and it needs to work, in a word, critical mass, or folks won't adapt or pay.
I also know, as a sr linux sysadmin, nothing is easy. Most of the leading edge technology is a moving target, ZM is no exception.
The point is simply, ZM is trying to be something for everyone. Considering the obvious limitations of manpower, it' REALLY hard, taking into consideration all the distros. Let the "build from source and here are the dependencies" go (not that there is enough available to comprehend)
I have experienced, first hand, using gentoo, ubuntu, fedora, RHEL the industry is still not ready for prime time in many cases.
What I have learned, is when using the most stable distro, things can go according to (some kind of) plan.
So a little background....
Got etch setup, added a source for ZM in sources.list, installed ZM. A year is like 7 on the internet. Installed ZM v 1.23.X. with relative ease, worked, well, OK.
Time to see if things have improved. Installed Lenny.
The reason?
Debian has proven, time and again, to be a very STABLE distro, unlike ubuntu spinoff of the same - unstable, the issues gentoo has in mgmt, the red-headheaded stepchild RH has divorced - and spun off - Fedora (not to say RH is any kind of distro worth paying for), and yet there are still adjustment in technology that needs to be "massaged" to make life grand. Not for the "average layperson with a spare PC".
And this is sorta the point....
Everyone on the face of this economically depressed world has a leftover, spare pc, that can't run the latest and greatest Microsoft OS and doesn't really care to "shoehorn" it into working cuz it's been a virus magnet that no one can tame, right????
It's all about crime and energy. We want to keep tabs on what's going on. Enter ZM. A pc ready for trash, with a couple hundred dollars and we can feel warm and fuzzy again. Make no mistake, only a few of us are in it for "the thrill of the hunt". The masses just want it to work, at which point, they will pay.
Docs are important. Most don't/can't read (again the masses).
I would pay for a live CD, like Mepis, that is based on a STABLE distro, with a "install me on a HD" button, that just works when it's all said and done. I'm sure many, many would.
Yep, there are lots of variables and it won't work for everyone with a $19 webcam from WalMart, but with some "run of the mill" hardware and $200 or $400 some industry partners working together (like BC and ZM), more folks would jump on-board, write a check for more features.
Just some random thoughts, not meaning to dis on anyone. ZM is a great product, just want to be done in 30 minutes and cover my loved ones, if you know what I mean.
Flame suit on.