Real world differences between CCD, CMOS, Sharp, Sony cams?
Posted: Sun Jul 04, 2010 3:03 pm
I'm on a very tight budget and pricing indoor composite cameras and I'm wondering, with vendors who don't offer sample shots, how can you tell the build and image quality?
There seem to be a really bewildering variety of choices. In the past I assumed CCD was almost always better but now people tell me no, they both are good.. etc.
It would be nice to save that money.
Also, I'm gathering that on the more inexpensive cameras, the 12mm "MTV"? lens thread is now pretty standard. Are those lenses generally interchangeable?
Assuming that I stay away from ones with the built in "IR LEDs" (which would seem like asking for trouble?) how long do the inexpensive cameras typically last in an indoor application? Are there any standouts in value?
Thank you.
There seem to be a really bewildering variety of choices. In the past I assumed CCD was almost always better but now people tell me no, they both are good.. etc.
It would be nice to save that money.
Also, I'm gathering that on the more inexpensive cameras, the 12mm "MTV"? lens thread is now pretty standard. Are those lenses generally interchangeable?
Assuming that I stay away from ones with the built in "IR LEDs" (which would seem like asking for trouble?) how long do the inexpensive cameras typically last in an indoor application? Are there any standouts in value?
Thank you.