How many cams on a Single-core Celeron 1.5GHz, 1GB RAM ???
Posted: Sat May 19, 2012 5:13 pm
I've done a lot of reading in the documentation and wiki. I've already read the hardware compatibility list. I don't have any cams yet, but I've ordered one to play with... it will be here next week.
I would like to have 7-8 cameras total (6 outdoor, and 1-2 indoor), all recording when motion is detected. I think it would be reasonable to detect on 3 or 4 fps until motion is detected... at which point I would like to record full motion video.
The cameras I am interested in are IP cameras from Foscam. They can do up to 30fps@320x240 or 15fps@640x480. I would rather record full resolution... in color... if possible.
I understand that performance can be optimized by defining detection zones correctly. I think I can handle that. For example, I think I would want to make ZM ignore the street (no need to record cars going by), ignore the trees, etc.
I do not see any benefit of saving any images or video when no motion is detected, so I would expect that my setup will only record something when motion is detected.
I would like to use a computer that uses as little electric power as possible. I have an old laptop that has a single-core Intel Celeron 1.5GHz processor, 1GB of RAM, and a 60GB hard drive. This machine is attractive because: A) It's free, B) It only uses 15 watts of electric power when at idle... and only about 45 watts when running a fairly heavy load. I could use an external HDD for video storage. What I'm wondering... is it possible to run 7 cameras in this way with such a low-power computer?
Any advice is welcome. I'm interested in ZM because it's free, it looks like it has lots of cool features, and I assume that linux would be less CPU hungry than Windows. I'm not a linux guru, but I have a co-worker who is really into Ubuntu, a good friend who has lots of experience with mySQL & PHP, and I'm a fast learner. I'm very experienced with Windows, and have some limited experience with HP-UX... and this could be a good opportunity to learn more about linux.
Some further information... I have a fairly powerful HTPC, but that machine sleeps when it is not in use and there are no shows being recorded. It has a quad-core i5 2.8GHz CPU, 8GB of RAM, 4TB of disk storage, and runs Windows 7 Media Center. When all four of my Media Center Extenders are running, plus the TV that is directly-connected to the HTPC, the CPU never gets much above 20% busy. I suppose it might be possible to run linux in a virtual machine on this PC... but I don't want to use so much electric power. This machine uses 165 watts at idle.
Thanks in advance for whatever help you can provide.
I would like to have 7-8 cameras total (6 outdoor, and 1-2 indoor), all recording when motion is detected. I think it would be reasonable to detect on 3 or 4 fps until motion is detected... at which point I would like to record full motion video.
The cameras I am interested in are IP cameras from Foscam. They can do up to 30fps@320x240 or 15fps@640x480. I would rather record full resolution... in color... if possible.
I understand that performance can be optimized by defining detection zones correctly. I think I can handle that. For example, I think I would want to make ZM ignore the street (no need to record cars going by), ignore the trees, etc.
I do not see any benefit of saving any images or video when no motion is detected, so I would expect that my setup will only record something when motion is detected.
I would like to use a computer that uses as little electric power as possible. I have an old laptop that has a single-core Intel Celeron 1.5GHz processor, 1GB of RAM, and a 60GB hard drive. This machine is attractive because: A) It's free, B) It only uses 15 watts of electric power when at idle... and only about 45 watts when running a fairly heavy load. I could use an external HDD for video storage. What I'm wondering... is it possible to run 7 cameras in this way with such a low-power computer?
Any advice is welcome. I'm interested in ZM because it's free, it looks like it has lots of cool features, and I assume that linux would be less CPU hungry than Windows. I'm not a linux guru, but I have a co-worker who is really into Ubuntu, a good friend who has lots of experience with mySQL & PHP, and I'm a fast learner. I'm very experienced with Windows, and have some limited experience with HP-UX... and this could be a good opportunity to learn more about linux.
Some further information... I have a fairly powerful HTPC, but that machine sleeps when it is not in use and there are no shows being recorded. It has a quad-core i5 2.8GHz CPU, 8GB of RAM, 4TB of disk storage, and runs Windows 7 Media Center. When all four of my Media Center Extenders are running, plus the TV that is directly-connected to the HTPC, the CPU never gets much above 20% busy. I suppose it might be possible to run linux in a virtual machine on this PC... but I don't want to use so much electric power. This machine uses 165 watts at idle.
Thanks in advance for whatever help you can provide.