Interface for multiple ZMs
Posted: Tue Oct 26, 2004 9:01 am
It seems that fairly often users inquire about hardware requirements for xxx many cameras at yyy resolution and framerate. Sometimes what they are after would call for multiple CPUs, GBs of RAM, RAID harddrive setups, etc.
I'm thinking that a good alternative approach is the "cluster" concept. Here in the US, I can put together a ZM box that will handle four cameras nicely for $500 or so. Suppose I want to design a system for 20 cameras for a five floor office building. Rather than assemble a "SuperZMbox" and route all the video cables to one location, I would choose to put a server on each floor. This approach has the advantage that a hardware failure will not bring down all 20 cameras.
If we had an interface that would integrate multiple ZM servers, such a cluster sytem would scale beautifully. A simplified user interface would not need to include admin functions , as these could be done using the regular ZM console on each server.
Ross
I'm thinking that a good alternative approach is the "cluster" concept. Here in the US, I can put together a ZM box that will handle four cameras nicely for $500 or so. Suppose I want to design a system for 20 cameras for a five floor office building. Rather than assemble a "SuperZMbox" and route all the video cables to one location, I would choose to put a server on each floor. This approach has the advantage that a hardware failure will not bring down all 20 cameras.
If we had an interface that would integrate multiple ZM servers, such a cluster sytem would scale beautifully. A simplified user interface would not need to include admin functions , as these could be done using the regular ZM console on each server.
Ross